Comments on: The End of Asylum as We Know It – Denouement

By: Hannah

Hannah — Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:14:13 +0000

In reply to Federale.

So you mean that if it’s not religious or overtly political it can’t qualify for asylum? Lucky for the persecuted that the laws say different. I can only imagine that you are just another privledged American that really has no clue about the rest of the world. And Christians…ahhh, the only group that’s right about god, so only they can be persecuted for their relgious beliefs. Pretty self righteous don’t you think?

By: Jason Dzubow

Jason Dzubow — Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:33:07 +0000

In reply to Federale. Really? The only persecution in the world today is against Christians in Muslim and Communist countries? You don't get out much do you?

By: Federale

Federale — Mon, 02 Sep 2013 23:14:20 +0000

The Chinese asylum fraud is no more than the Somali refugee fraud, the Mexican asylum fraud, or the Brazilian homosexual asylum fraud. In fact, most asylum and refugee claims are fraud. Almost none show any claim based on an individual’s opposition to a dictatorial government or face genocide. It is time to reform asylum to discourage fraud.

The real solution is not only end the CAA, but end all the similar claims such as the P-2 and P-3 claims, and any claim not based on individuals facing real persecution.

The only real ethnic or religious oppression that exists in this world is that directed against Christians in Communist and Muslim countries, similar liberal political opposition to their dictatorial regimes.