Good News on Work Permits

by Jason Dzubow

A new rule in the federal register has temporarily increased the automatic extension period for Employment Authorization Documents (“EADs”) for asylum seekers and others from 180 days to 540 days. The 540-day extension applies to anyone with a pending EAD renewal, even those whose EAD and 180-day extension have already expired. This means that all asylum seekers with timely-filed renewals are able to work lawfully for 540 days beyond the expiration date on their current EAD card.

Starting on May 4, 2022, EAD receipts for certain categories–including c-8, asylum pending–will list the 540-day extension on the receipt itself. USCIS has also updated its website to reflect that EAD receipts listing the 180-day extension have been extended by an additional 360 days, to 540 days total. USCIS will not be sending out new receipts, and so if you need proof of the automatic extension for your employer or the DMV, you can show them this web page. In order to qualify for the automatic extension, you must file to renew your current EAD before it expires.                       (more…)

Continue reading

118 Comments

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!

by Jason Dzubow

Let me tell you about some recent events in my office.

We had two cases set for individual hearings this week. Both cases involve noncitizens who have been waiting years for their decisions, both have family members abroad who they hope to bring to the U.S. if their claims are successful, and both have strong cases for asylum.

For the first case, we prepared and submitted evidence earlier in the pandemic, but the case was postponed at the last minute due to Covid. We were hoping that the new date would stick, given that restrictions are easing and the court now has a system to do cases remotely (called Webex). As the date approached, we filed additional evidence and scheduled two practice sessions for the client. We also regularly checked the Immigration Court online portal, which lists our court dates, to be sure the case was still on the docket. (more…)

Continue reading

148 Comments

Failures and Solutions at the Asylum Office

by Jason Dzubow

A new report, Lives in Limbo: How the Boston Asylum Office Fails Asylum Seekers, raises concerns about the Boston Asylum Office and about the affirmative asylum system in general. Here, we’ll discuss some of the report’s findings and some suggested improvements to the system. I want to focus on one particular suggestion in the report, which has been on my mind lately: Whether asylum applications can be approved largely “on the papers,” with only a brief interview. But first, let’s take a look at the report’s main points. (more…)

Continue reading

151 Comments

Affirmative Asylum Updates: Winners and Losers

by Jason Dzubow

If you are a regular or even occasional reader of this humble blog, you know my opinion of the affirmative asylum system–it is a disaster. There are currently more than 435,000 pending cases, representing upwards of 800,000 people. Some applicants have been waiting for their interviews for five, six, seven or more years, separated from spouses and children and living in existential uncertainty. Now, it seems that we are on the verge of a perfect storm, which will throw tens of thousands of new cases into the system at the same time as resources will be diverted away from affirmative cases. These changes will result in some winners and some losers. Here, we’ll discuss these new developments and how they might affect the asylum process. (more…)

Continue reading

286 Comments

Anatomy of an Asylum Office Inquiry: Expedite Requests

by Jason Dzubow

Let’s imagine a not-so-hypothetical scenario: You filed for asylum at the Asylum Office, and your case has been pending for years without an interview. Or here’s another one: You finally had an interview at the Asylum Office, but you have been waiting months or years without a decision. Today and in an up-coming post, we’ll talk about the most effective ways to make an inquiry in these situations. (more…)

Continue reading

195 Comments

Asylum for Russian Defectors

by Jason Dzubow

Last week, Vladimir Putin and his supporters launched a vicious and unjustified war against Ukraine. The war is an act of mass murder and terror against the people of Ukraine. Given Mr. Putin’s history of oppression at home and violent interventions abroad, there is little reason to be optimistic about how (or when) this war will end. And of course, there is a real danger that the situation will escalate into something much larger.

It is unclear how much support the war has from ordinary Russians. Perhaps many within Russia have been misled by “President” Putin’s propaganda machine, which has repeatedly and falsely accused the Ukrainian government of persecuting Russian speakers in Ukraine, and which has painted the war in terms of Russia standing up to the West. While Mr. Putin’s popularity seems to have increased before fighting started, there are signs that many Russian’s are not buying what he is selling. Indeed, protests have continued throughout the country despite a government crackdown.

And what of Russians living abroad? They are less likely to be swayed by Mr. Putin’s false propaganda, as they have access to more reliable sources of news. My sense is that most Russians in the diaspora oppose the current war.

In this post, I am interested in a specific sub-set of Russians living outside their country: Diplomats and other government employees. If such people defect to protest the unjust war against Ukraine, would they be eligible for political asylum or some other relief in the United States? (more…)

Continue reading

236 Comments

Persecuted for Seeking Asylum in the United States

by Jason Dzubow

A new report from Human Rights Watch documents the fate of dozens of Cameroonian asylum seekers deported to their country between 2019 and 2021. According to HRW, people deported to Cameroon “faced arbitrary arrest and detention; enforced disappearances; torture, rape, and other violence; extortion; unfair prosecutions; confiscation of their national IDs; harassment; and abuses against their relatives.” In addition, many also “reported experiencing excessive force, medical neglect, and other mistreatment in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody in the U.S.” Sadly, none of this is particularly surprising.

The portions of the report that I want to discuss here relate to asylum seeker confidentiality (or the lack thereof) and to the persecution of returnees because they sought asylum in the United States. (more…)

Continue reading

112 Comments

I’m a Dependent in an Asylum Case (part 1)

by Jason Dzubow

Asylum seekers may include their spouse and unmarried, minor (under 21-years old) children as dependents on their asylum case, as long as the dependents are physically present in the United States. Here, we’ll discuss issues related to dependents at the Asylum Office. In a future, post, we’ll discuss dependents in Immigration Court, as there are some differences. Let’s get right to it. (more…)

Continue reading

177 Comments

Expedited EAD Renewals for Healthcare Workers

by Jason Dzubow

On December 28, 2021, USCIS announced that. “if you are a healthcare worker who has a pending Employment Authorization Document (EAD) renewal application [Form I-765] and your EAD expires in 30 days or less or has already expired, you can request expedited processing of your EAD application.” This is a positive development, since EAD renewals have lately been very slow.

One group that has been impacted by the delayed renewals is asylum seekers, and we are seeing people wait up to ten months for their new EAD cards (asylees–people whose asylum cases have been granted–are also experiencing long delays to renew their EADs, but such people are eligible to work even without an EAD). Here, we’ll talk about the EAD renewal process and the new rules for healthcare workers (and while it probably goes without saying, yes, I will complain about the new expedite procedure). (more…)

Continue reading

166 Comments

Circularity in Particular Social Group Decisions

by Jason Dzubow

This post is by Jim Feroli, an attorney with Immigration Legal Services (ILS) of Catholic Charities, Washington, DC. He has worked with ILS since 2014 and helps to manage the pro bono program. He focuses on asylum, U Visa and VAWA cases, and removal defense generally. He has also represented immigration clients before the Board of Immigration Appeals and U.S. Courts of Appeals.

I’m a movie fan. If you haven’t seen it, I recommend the film Gladiator. Russell Crowe stars as Maximus, a Roman general who is betrayed, sold into slavery, and forced to fight in gladiator matches. The movie has some good action scenes and strong acting by Crowe and Joaquin Phoenix, who plays the demented and cruel heir to the throne. It’s about persistence, redemption, and the human spirit and is worth a watch on Netflix.

As an immigration lawyer, I wondered would Maximus, as a slave in ancient Rome, qualify for membership in a particular social group? I’m sure most people watching the film had the same concern. My answer is yes. Maximus’s status is immutable. Slavery in this context is both a status and a condition. As much as Maximus may want to change his status, it is beyond his control. By chance he could be emancipated, but more likely, he will die a slave. Being a member of the group of slaves is also particular. It is distinct and the borders of the group are clear. There is a strong contrast between persons who are slaves—and thus private property—and those who are not. Generally, people should understand if they fit within the group of slaves or free persons, in this case Roman citizens. Lastly, the group is socially distinct. Legally and economically, society recognizes slaves as different. They are deprived the rights to participate in civic life and may be bought and sold by others. Certainly, a runaway slave should qualify for refugee status and not be returned to face additional persecution. (more…)

Continue reading

117 Comments

No One Should Have to Wait Years for the U.S. to Consider Their Asylum Claim

by Jason Dzubow

This article is by Andrea Barron, the advocacy program manager at the Torture Abolition and Survivors Support Coalition International, based in Washington, DC. The article was originally published in the Washington Post.

Genet Lire Dobamo was a 17-year-old elite sprinter with the Ethiopian national team when she defected at Dulles International Airport in 2014, terrified of returning to her native Ethiopia. She held Ethiopia’s national title for the 400-meter race and had an excellent chance of representing her country in the 2016 Olympics. But Dobamo had been severely beaten by police for opposing Ethiopia’s one-party dictatorship and was frightened of being tortured again or even killed if she returned home.

She applied for asylum in March 2015 and was featured in a Washington Post story on elite Ethiopian runners seeking asylum in the United States. The Post reporter said the asylum process can take “months, sometimes more than a year.” Six years later, Dobamo has still not been interviewed by an asylum officer at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), part of the Department of Homeland Security. (more…)

Continue reading

131 Comments

Cancel Culture in Immigration Court

by Jason Dzubow

For “respondents” (non-citizens in removal proceedings) and their lawyers, Individual Hearings in Immigration Court are a big deal. Evidence must be gathered. Affidavits have to be prepared, checked, and re-checked. Witnesses must be identified, convinced to attend the hearing, and prepared for trial. Respondents practice their testimony. In most cases, the noncitizen has been waiting for many months or years for the trial date. The result of the trial determines whether the applicant can remain in the United States or must leave. When a respondent receives asylum, he is permitted to stay in the U.S. If he loses, he may be deported to a country where he faces danger. In many cases, respondents have family members here or overseas who are counting on them, and the outcome of the case affects the family members as well as the respondent. All of this provokes anxiety and anticipation. In short, Individual Hearings are life-changing events that profoundly effect respondents and their families.

So what happens when the Individual Hearing is canceled? (more…)

Continue reading

131 Comments

A Tale of the First Thanksgiving – or – The Beginner’s Guide to Immigration Bureaucracy

by Jason Dzubow

This year marks the 400th anniversary of the first Thanksgiving, celebrated in Massachusetts in 1621 by 53 Pilgrims and 90 Native Americans from the Wampanoag tribe. To commemorate this grand occasion, researchers here at the Asylumist have unearthed the original immigration file of one of the Pilgrim families, William and Mary Brewster, and their children Jonathan, Patience, Fear, Love, and Wrestling (and yes, those are their real names; if you don’t believe me, look it up). Here, for the first time, is that story.

The Brewster family arrived in North America on the Mayflower on November 21, 1620. They and their shipmates did not encounter anyone from Homeland Security, and so they entered without inspection and immediately began working without authorization to find food and shelter. But the land was barren and frozen, and the Pilgrims began to die off one-by-one. Seeing their plight, a group of Native American activists, calling themselves No More Deaths, illegally provided food to the beleaguered migrants. The Wampanoag council later charged these do-gooders with felony alien smuggling and other crimes, but failed to obtain a conviction. Predictably, this encouraged more Europeans to make the dangerous journey to America. These included nonconformists and Anabaptists, though some, we assume, were good people. (more…)

Continue reading

130 Comments

Asylum for Capitol Rioters

by Jason Dzubow

I suppose it was inevitable that some of the Trump supporters charged in the attack on our Capitol would seek asylum overseas. These people are already pre-disposed to victimhood, and so it makes sense that some would see their prosecution–for harming law enforcement officers, threatening government workers, disrupting an election, damaging federal property, and trespassing–as a form of persecution.

Also, there are plenty of governments around the world that want to harm our country by sowing division and encouraging further violence. And so it’s hardly surprising that certain nations would be only too happy to offer asylum to the Capitol rioters, as a way to stick it to the United States.

We now have our first (known) example of a Capitol rioter seeking asylum abroad. Evan Neumann is wanted in the U.S. on charges of violent entry and disorderly conduct on the Capitol grounds, and for assaulting, resisting and obstructing law enforcement during civil disorder. He has fled to Belarus and applied for asylum. It would be easy to mock Mr. Neumann and the “Republic” of Belarus, but here, I want to discuss whether Mr. Neumann might qualify for asylum under international law. (more…)

Continue reading

161 Comments