Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) has issued a new report confirming what immigration attorneys already know: the waiting time for cases in the Immigration Courts is longer than ever. From my experience, a typical case in the over-burdened Arlington, Virginia court takes almost two years. It turns out, Arlington isn’t the slowest court in the land:
From the TRAC website:
Cases awaiting a hearing in the nation’s Immigration Courts reached an all-time high of 228,421 in the first months of FY 2010, according to very timely government enforcement data obtained by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC). The current number of pending cases is up 23 percent just since the end of FY 2008, and 82 percent higher than it was ten years ago.
Wait times also vary markedly from one court to the next. At one extreme there are the Los Angeles and Boston Immigration Courts where pending cases have now been waiting for an average of 713 days and 612 days, respectively. At the other extreme, there is the Florence, Arizona Immigration Court with an average wait time of 75 days and the Miami (Krome) Immigration Court with 82 days.
I imagine that the courts in Florence and Miami are faster because those locations deal primarily with detained immigrants. The courts make detained cases a priority. Not, as you might expect, because the alien is in detention, but rather because the alien is in detention at government expense. This is made clear when you view the courts’ files, which are prominently labeled, “Detained at Government Expense.”
The problem could be alleviated (or at least ameliorated) if the Department of Justice would begin filling some of the 48 immigration judge vacancies. Indeed, according to TRAC, since 2007, the number of immigration judges has actually gone down (from 229 to 227) while the case load has increased dramatically. The backlog has resulted in difficult waits for asylum seekers and others caught in the system.
In a strongly-worded response to TRAC, EOIR Acting Director Thomas Snow calls the report “unbalanced” and states that it fails to acknowledge EOIR’s efforts to fill the vacant positions. Acting Director Snow points out that 15 judges are in the final stage of the selection process, and EOIR is interviewing hundreds of candidates to fill the remaining IJ openings. For aliens in the system, the process cannot move fast enough. To properly enforce the nation’s immigration laws, ensure due process, and fulfill our humanitarian obligations, we need more judges.
[…] Asylumist reported on this problem in recent post, We Need More Judges. EOIR has stated that additional immigration judges are on the way. For asylum seekers stuck […]